Unadulterated

Two very different news stories caught my eye at the end of May. The initial article in Triple Pundit, praised ten companies for the excellence of their sustainability reporting. The other, in the Guardian, reported on a Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) study of 28 publicly traded companies in the S&P 500 that work both sides of the room to influence the debate on climate change. The study found that some businesses claim to care about climate action while quietly supporting groups working to discredit climate science.

Two positive trends in product sustainability and a recent report highlighting species loss prompt us to look at how companies consider the impacts of their own activities on biodiversity.

If we take as our premise that corporate responsibility means more than just running a company in a responsible manner – that the term is imbued with a larger sense of responsibility for humanity as well – than what role should a responsible company play in alleviating hunger?

Some things are really hard for me to get my head around….the number of people in the world, the number of people who vote for American Idol contestants and the amount of trash that Americans generate.

Can you imagine a sustainable economy where we live within our planetary means? An economy that is transparent and accountable in decision-making and equitably shares benefits and resources? An economy where capital markets collaborate in promoting a just society?

I’ve traipsed through my share of college campuses during the past year with a high school senior in tow and have been impressed by the sustainability achievements the colleges have touted. A combination of youthful energy, innovative funding mechanisms, and some healthy rivalry have pushed many colleges to embrace sustainability across their buildings, curriculum, food services and campus culture. My conclusion? The campus sustainability revolution runs deep, is here to stay, and puts some corporate efforts to shame.

Citizen activists have been behind many of the key environmental improvements in the United States. Check out my favorite movie, Erin Brokovich, to see just one of thousands of examples of citizens pushing successfully for change. Not so in China. Doesn’t change start at the top there? Maybe not.

We all know it’s difficult to influence ethical labor conditions in the supply chain. But a recent article in The Economist on March 31st discusses just how hard it is. This follows up on our recent post on Chinese supply chain issues.

Can you find substitutes for the rare earth minerals in your products? Reduce water consumption in manufacturing in water-scarce areas by 80%? Eliminate waste in product design?

It’s a challenge to package sustainability goals in a way that is both meaningful for your business and that conveys an inspiring vision of the future.

If your supply chain extends to China, it is a good time to step back and take a look at some useful resources for understanding this rapidly growing, complex country.

With leaves off the trees and no snow to speak of here in New England, I can’t escape the sight of graying plastic bags flapping in the wind, held hostage by unwilling tree branches...